Case Studies


The Amazon rainforest

The Amazon rainforest


Key Messages


Risk assessment


The Amazon is approaching ecological tipping points due to interacting climate and land-use feedbacks that threaten to trigger large-scale forest degradation and regime shifts in the range 1.5-2 °C global warming.


These changes risk transforming forested areas into altered ecosystems, weakening global climate regulation, altering regional climate and accelerating biodiversity loss.


Negative social tipping points, including displacement, health impacts and cultural erosion are unfolding alongside ecological forest transitions, especially among
Indigenous and traditional populations.


These impacts and risks remain significantly under-addressed in climate policy and are intensified where governance fails to secure land rights, or enforce protections, or support adaptation.


Indigenous Territories and Protected Areas exhibit strong climate mitigation potential, underscoring their vital role in maintaining carbon stocks and resisting
ecosystem collapse.


In contrast, undesignated Public Forests account for the majority of carbon losses from degradation, reflecting the consequences of weak governance and land tenure insecurity.


Without immediate action, cascading risks could result in irreversible losses to both ecosystems and communities, undermining regional and global sustainability.

Recommendations


The Amazon forest holds global significance as a biocultural and climatic -regulating system; safeguarding it requires urgent, justice-centered strategies that integrate understanding of ecological thresholds, social vulnerability and climate adaptation.


Positive social tipping points can be catalyzed by inclusive and polycentric governance, recognition of traditional knowledge systems and targeted financial investments in forest conservation, restoration and supporting Indigenous People and Communities
Territories and their livelihoods.


These interventions have the potential to reverse degradation feedbacks and ensure socio-ecological resilience across the Amazon.


What the Experts Say


Patricia Pinho
The Amazon Environmental Research Institute, Brazil

Marina Hirota
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil

Back to top

Atlantic ocean circulation

ATLANTIC OCEAN CIRCULATION


Key Messages


Risk assessment


The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) and Subpolar Gyre (SPG) have different tipping points and timescales of transition but are strongly coupled via influencing stratification of the northern North Atlantic ocean.


Crossing either tipping point has numerous impacts, including much harsher northwestern European winters, disruption of the West African Monsoon, decreased agricultural yield and marine ecosystem shifts


The conditions under which SPG and AMOC can tip remain uncertain, due to a limited observational record and biases in climate models, but we cannot exclude that an AMOC tipping point may already have been passed.


Deep winter mixing in both the SPG and Green-Iceland-Norwegian Seas is projected to collapse in the North Atlantic before 2050 in many CMIP6 models causing AMOC to decline to weak states without a deep circulation.


The likelihood of tipping for both systems increases with global temperature.

Recommendations


Current observational arrays in the Atlantic Ocean should be maintained and Earth System Model bias should be reduced as both are crucial for the science of AMOC or SPG tipping and future early warning systems.


Continuous monitoring of SPG and AMOC risks and nation-specific complex risk assessments of the impacts of AMOC or SPG tipping should be made for European countries to inform prevention and adaptation policies.


Preventing the crossing of AMOC or SPG tipping points should be a primary governance target.


The potential proximity of SPG collapse demands that European governments and the EU revisit and update national and European climate adaptation and preparedness plans, policies and institutions to account for the expected impacts of this tipping process.


Global climate mitigation efforts should be accelerated to minimise temperature overshoot of 1.5°C to minimise the risk of SPG or AMOC tipping. This requires shortening net-zero timelines and immediate investment in the development and scaling of sustainable carbon removal technologies


The potential benefits and risks of solar radiation management (SRM) should be explored during a moratorium on SRM implementation and large-scale experiments.

AMOC Scenarios

amocscenarios.org is an interactive web tool that visualises potential climate impacts of a collapsed Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) under different global warming scenarios. It displays temperature and extremes using data from state-of-the-art climate model simulations.

AMOC collapse dashboard


What the Experts Say


Jesse Abrams
University of Exeter

Back to top

Warm-water coral reefs

Warm-water coral reefs


Key Messages


Risk assessment


Warm-water coral reefs are vital to the wellbeing of up to a billion people and almost a million species.


Globally, coral reefs are experiencing unprecedented mortality under repeated mass bleaching events, highlighting the impact that global warming (interacting with other, predominantly human-driven environmental stressors) is already having.


The central estimate of the thermal tipping point for warm-water coral reefs of 1.2°C global warming above pre-industrial is already exceeded and without stringent climate mitigation their upper thermal threshold of 1.5°C may be reached within the next 10 years, compromising reef functioning and provision of ecosystem services to millions of people.


Even under the most optimistic current emission scenarios of stabilising warming at 1.5°C without any overshoot, it is considered that warm-water coral reefs are virtually certain (>99% probability) to tip, given the upper range of their thermal tipping point is 1.5°C.


The goal of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming “well below 2°C” or 1.5°C will not prevent coral reefs from irreversibly passing their thermal tipping point.

Recommendations


Stringent emission mitigation and enhanced removals are needed to return to a global mean surface warming below 1.2°C with a minimal overshoot period and eventually returning to 1°C above pre-industrial. These temperatures are essential for retaining functional warm-water coral reefs at meaningful scale.


Minimising non-climatic stressors, particularly by improving reef management, can give reefs the best chance of surviving under what must be a minimal temperature exceedance from their tipping point threshold.


Urgent policy and societal responses are needed to address the ecosystem and livelihood impacts of degraded or non-functional reefs. Regional risk assessments that investigate the impacts must be produced.


What the Experts Say


David Obura
CORDIO, East Africa & IPBES Chair

Warm water coral reef Q&A


Are you saying that the TP for coral reefs has been breached?

The tipping point range for warm-water reefs is between 1 to 1.5C of global warming, with 1.2C as the central estimate. Since we’ve 1. already crossed this central estimate (we are currently at ca 1.35C), 2. have already experienced a year (2024) above reefs’ 1.5C upper tipping point threshold and 3. have ample evidence this long-term temperature level will occur within the next decade, we are saying yes: reefs are already reaching a dangerous tipping point and are perilously close to temperature levels that threaten their survival at any meaningful scale. We already knew coral reefs were in crisis, but the increasing intensity and frequency of ocean heatwaves are accelerating their decline and functional degradation.

There is also a delayed ocean heating response to atmospheric greenhouse gases and temperature level which masks the full impact that current temperature and GHG levels will have on reefs.

What does that mean for the future of reefs?

We’re not saying everything is now lost. It’s a process. Each bleaching event has become more extensive and more extreme in terms of the exposure of heat and impacts. Exceeding the thermal tipping point means an acceleration of on-going reef decline and the loss of the essential ecosystem services they provide (including food security, coastal protection against hurricanes and storm surges, tourism and habitat loss for biodiversity). The stark reality is that we will not retain functional reefs at meaningful scale unless we stabilise global mean temperatures below 1.2C with minimum temperature overshoot. Whether we can avoid irreversible degradation and loss of coral reefs depends on minimising the level and duration of temperature overshoot through the strongest possible climate change mitigation actions.

When can we expect these changes to happen?

The impacts of excessive temperature on reefs are already being experienced around the world (for example, the recent (2023-2025) fourth global bleaching event has exposed over 80% of the world’s warm-water coral reefs to bleaching levels of temperature stress), but different reefs will have different response times and different impact levels. In general, the cumulative impacts (including non-climate stressors) will be increasingly felt as we approach and exceed the 1.5 C upper tipping point threshold. Coral reefs face irreversible degradation and loss if we continue with inadequate global temperature targets and insufficient mitigation action.

How will conservation funding be affected by this claim? Should conservation action stop?

Although the situation is certainly dire, we’re not saying we’re at the end of the road. Non-climate conservation action is more essential than ever to maximise reef resilience against the growing impacts of temperature and ocean acidification stress. Increased funding is urgently needed to minimise overfishing, destructive fishing techniques, waste-water and fertiliser run off, sedimentation and unsustainable coastal development. Extending and fully protecting existing marine protected areas (e.g. no fishing areas) is also needed. As some regions are declining faster and more extensively than others, urgent policy and societal responses are needed to address the ecosystem and livelihood impacts of degraded or non-functional reefs, which also require funding.

For reefs to have a viable future, it’s essential that all possible conservation support is provided in parallel with stringent climate change mitigation action to return global mean temperature to reefs central, and eventually lower, tipping point threshold levels.

At the time of the 2023 report, we had already passed the 1.2C central threshold for TP for corals. Why is the claim made now and not before?

In 2023 we already exceeded the 1.2C central tipping point threshold for warm-water coral reefs. However, we were not sure then that we would be so near to exceeding their 1.5C upper tipping point threshold. Year 2024 already gave us a taste of what a 1.5C world would be. Coinciding with that year, and as added evidence from the 2023 report, reefs have been suffering the most extended and severe Global mass coral bleaching event in history (2023-2025), with more than 80% of global coral reefs being exposed to bleaching level temperatures around the world. There was also less awareness of just how severe the 1.5C temperature exceedance overshoot would be in the absence of greatly improved climate change mitigation. We’re far more certain now than we were in 2023 that the future of coral reefs, as we know them, is profoundly threatened without greatly improved climate change mitigation action and conservation support.

The solution proposed for reefs is to return to their lower 1C threshold, and/or to retain the 1.2C, below the Paris Agreement goal of 1.5C. Correct? Is this feasible?

As coral reef specialists our goal is to assess what’s needed for the sustainability of coral reefs, rather than the feasibility of the mitigation needs. Returning to 1C for a safe planet has plenty of backing up from other sources, including the 350ppm target, a “safe & just” planetary boundary or the work by Breyer et al. (2023), to cite a few. We believe it feasible to return to lower Earth temperatures, if mitigation commitments including short-lived greenhouse gases like methane take place, and if CO2 removals (CDR) at scale through nature restoration are financed. It is a question of scales, means, technological advances and policy will. Natural sinks, above all, need to be retained, protected and enhanced.

Download Coral Q&A

Melanie McField (director of Healthy Reefs for Healthy People), Paul Pearce-Kelly (Zoological Society London), Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta (Technical University of Munich and the Joint Research Center-Ispra) et al.

Back to top

Mountain Glaciers

Mountain Glaciers


Key Messages


Risk assessment


Mountain glacier tipping behaviour depends on a complex interplay between topography and climate, with mountain glaciers that experience similar external forcing having the potential to respond differently depending on local conditions.


Áakʼw Tʼáak Sítʼ and other outlet glaciers of the Juneau icefield, Alaska, have been suggested as a potential mountain glacier tipping system, with ice segregation and the bedrock hypsometry leading to nonlinear
mass loss and glacier retreat.


Rapid deglaciation of Áakʼw Tʼáak Sít and other glaciers disrupts the relationship between Indigenous communities, glaciers and glacial landscapes, depriving future generations of this component of their identity and history, which are inseparable from the land.


The retreat of Áakʼw Tʼáak Sítʼ’s tributary glaciers has led to annual outburst floods in Juneau, the future occurrence of which will depend on rates of ice retreat, the pattern of retreat and the formation of future glacier separations.


Rapid mass loss of Áakʼw Tʼáak Sítʼ could negatively impact tourism in Juneau as the glacier retreats from the Mendenhall Glacier Visitor Center viewshed, where an average of every third visitor to the state of Alaska visits.


The economic consequences of tipping on fishing and salmon stocks are less clear, giving the complex interplay between water temperature, air temperature and riverbed scouring, all of which impact aquatic ecosystems.

Recommendations


Anticipatory governance considerations at the local level regarding glacier loss must involve multiple partners and rights holders , including Indigenous community governments, federal and state agencies and local government, as well as community members, particularly in the context of resource management and the opening of navigable U.S.-Canada border crossings,
following ice retreat.


What the Experts Say


Donovan Dennis
PIK and Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Germany

Back to top

Downloads


Download the Global Tipping Points Report 2025
Summary
13MB

Download

Download the Global Tipping Points Report 2025
Full Report
25MB

Download

Sponsors and Partners


University of Exeter GSI
PIK
Max Planck Institut
Bezos Earth Fund
ARIA
Quadrature Climate Foundation
WWF
trex
World Challenges Foundation